Plans to stage a second round of peace talks on Syria in Geneva have been stalled since March, partly over the US veto on Iranian attendance, and partly due to disputes in the Syrian rebel forces over the composition of its delegation, and the presence of forces loyal to Assad.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/02/vladimir-putin-syria
So the US wanted to have peace talks just with one side of the conflict?
Does serious diplomacy not require to have both sides sitting on one table and discussing?
Hat dies auf ShortNews Middle East rebloggt und kommentierte:
Add your thoughts here… (optional)